New Mexico Political Journal
mobile icon
New Mexico Political Journal

.

Show Subnavigation
  • Home
  • About NMPJ
    • About
    • Editor
  • Feedback
  • Advertise on NMPJ

FacebookTwitter

If you read New Mexico Political Journal from a Facebook link, and appreciate the coverage of events, please “like” NMPJ on Facebook.

Congressman Pearce, Harvey Yates, and Pearce Fundraiser Involved in Search for US Attorney and Other Federal Jobs. Many Question Ethics.

01/06/2017

Republican National Committeeman Harvey Yates has been tasked by Congressman Steve Pearce to "control the process" for the appointment of a new US Attorney for New Mexico and other federal government posts, this according to two reports New Mexico Political Journal received Wednesday morning.

Additionally, Andrea Goff, Pearce's own fundraiser, has been working with Yates. Yates and Goff have conducted "several interviews" of interested or potential applicants. Neither Yates nor Goff work for Pearce’s official congressional office, and neither works for the Trump transition team.

SIGNIFICANCE and PROPRIETY

First the significance: It is customary for senior senators of the same political party as an incoming presidential administration to be given considerable deference or at least serious consultation on patronage or other political appointments in their states.

New Mexico has no Republican senators at all, so there is something of a vacuum in terms of that traditional source of in-state input and political advice. That vacuum is more acutely felt because of the fact that Trump is somewhat "off the grid" in that he's less known personally, and the people surrounding him (at least until relatively recently) are less known to influential Republicans in each state than has been the case with other Republican presidents.

Recognizing that traditional senatorial role has no occupant, Representative Pearce decided he would assume that role himself—and certainly he has a better chance of making that happen than do Senators Udall and Heinrich, who have no chance at all.

Now the Propriety: It is highly unusual for a political fundraiser or political party official to be put in charge of selecting government personnel. So Pearce's placement of Goff and Yates into his recent arrangement has alarmed some, believing that it could provide the Democrats with quite a bit of fodder during the confirmation process.

Some observers also believe Pearce does not have nearly the stroke with the new administration that Yates and Goff are proclaiming.

WE CHECKED OUT ONE, APPARENTLY FALSE, REPORT

NMPJ received one report indicating that a prominent, 60 year-old Albuquerque lawyer had been designated as the likely nominee. We looked into that report with some skepticism. In our observation, US Attorneys are generally on the young side—35 to 40 years-old, looking to parlay a successful stint in the job in to bigger and better things.

We knew that the lawyer whose name had been provided to us was not only older than a likely nominee, but he was already a mega-success as an attorney in private practice and would have nothing to gain as a US Attorney who would earn only a small fraction of what the man currently earns in his lucrative practice.

A little checking confirmed our doubts. The Albuquerque attorney is not the least bit interested.

SANTA FE ATTORNEY'S NAME SURFACES

Another report — one we have confirmed with various sources — indicates that the Yates/Goff choice is John Anderson, of counsel in the Santa Fe law firm of Holland & Hart. While we cannot confirm that Mr. Anderson has shown interest in the job, certainly Anderson's name makes more sense in that he is within the range of the generally-appropriate age, and he is also highly regarded in his profession.

(Additionally, it has to be pointed out that the process put in place by Pearce is no reflection on Mr. Anderson, who, if in fact is meeting with Yates and Goff, is doing so in good faith, probably assuming they are acting in some sort of official capacity, and as part of an appropriate, legitimate process.)

YATES' PREVIOUS DENIALS SEEN AS DUBIOUS

Yates, for his part, has always denied the Martinez Administration charges that he wanted to "control government" and "tell Susana what to do."

One insider told us:

"Susana rejected his high-handed approach mainly because they disagreed on several key policy issues, including education reform and driver's licenses, and that's why he got pissed. He's always denied this, but his actions now proved that denial false."

One additional concern is the fact that Yates and Goff are the persons mentioned most prominently in the Obama Administration's Department of Justice investigation in New Mexico that closed last year.

In that lengthy probe, Yates and Goff, along with several Democrat operatives and a whole slew of shady actors (some of whom ended up incarcerated) surfaced over and over as the sources of complaints that initiated and continued to drive the investigation for months. The entire ordeal ended up costing multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars in time and resources, only to end up without evidence to proceed.

In the end Yates and Goff (among others) were viewed as having been successful in getting the government to at least attempt to carry out a political jihad against people they perceived as their "enemies."  Their efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, although they may have inflicted heavy legal costs on some.

PROPRIETY—Again

The problem that may arise is the perception of these two individuals (Yates and Goff) as being seen as people who are not troubled whatsoever at the (possibly improper) use of the massive resources of the government to punish political opponents, or at least attempt to do so.

Given that reputation, their placement in charge of an effort to identify a worthy US attorney candidate can be viewed as frightening to some, but possibly very embarrassing to the incoming Trump Administration—once all court records and publicly-available documents are researched and reviewed.

Yates and Goff’s attempts to misuse the prosecutorial powers of the US Government may well be seen as disqualifying them from “vetting” other people. Appointments of federal officials, some believe, should not be a role reserved for people who are viewed as having old scores to settle—and who are willing to settle those scores using the political capital of a brand-new administration.

PEARCE HURT BY HIS EFFORT TO GET RID OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS OFFICE

In addition to his own "appointment" of Yates and Goff, Pearce himself is seen as having "bad timing" in this whole affair, at the very least.

One observer told us:

"Here's the guy who led the fight to disown the office of Congressional Ethics, and he has gone and appointed a party boss and a fundraiser to dole out government jobs. How crazy is that?"

And another said:

"Party boss and fundraiser handing out appointments. Richardson Era stuff."

We can't say how much of these quotes and assessments represents sour grapes on the part of those who are speaking about Pearce. Yet juxtaposed with Pearce's antics over the ethics issue, it all does seem that his actions have the potential to look bad.

If Pearce truly does have a party boss and fundraiser doling out jobs then that approach to personnel selection isn't exactly conforming with the "drain the swamp" concept that Trump made a central part of his campaign and which congressional Republicans and incoming administration officials seem to be embracing.


Email us (at nmpj@dfn.com) with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas.


Intelligent Political Discourse—for the Thoughtful New Mexican

back to list
National Issues

National Issues

Democrats

2016 Presidential Campaign - Democrats

Republicans

2016 Presidential Campaign - Republicans

Jeb Bush gets religion.

"They said he got religion at the end, and I'm glad that he did."  — Tom T. Hall. The Year Clayton Delaney died.

Well, it's official.  Jeb Bush has changed quite of few of his positions on illegal immigration.  The single most significant is that he no longer endorses the "path to citizenship" for those who came here illegally. 

This is, after all, the key portion of any proposal aimed at "reforming" our existing illegal immigration situation.

No sensible citizen can see any point in trying to deport between 12 and 16 million people currently living in America illegally.  And no candidate for any office that we know of supports that.  What the average American wants is for the country to "get a handle on it."  They want it stopped, our borders secured and future illegal immigration prevented.  It is a national security issue.

The Path to Legal Status

The only way to accomplish the above goals, is to identify current illegal immigrants, get them accounted for, have them documented, and placed on a path to legal status.  Neither they nor their children or spouses should live in a state of fear or anxiety.

But a path to "citizenship" is not the right course.  It is not morally or legally correct.  A merciful and compassionate nation can provide the safeguards of legal status without sending the message to the rest of the world that all you have to do is cross our border and you will eventually get to become a citizen, thus circumventing the legal framework scores of millions of Americans have followed, honored and respected.

If someone who is granted legal status eventually wants to become a citizen, that person should have to return to his or her country of origin and wait in line like 20 million people around the world are doing at any given time.  Failing that, America will forever send the signal that anyone in the world can "jump the line," and that there is no reason at all to obey our immigration and naturalization laws.

We Like Jeb Bush

We are glad Jeb Bush has learned this lesson.  He is a fine speaker, and can eloquently explain his positions on complex issue.  If he were not named "Bush" he would be an actual top tier candidate—in all that that title would entail, including likelihood of acceptance and support of and from the American people in the primaries, and in any theoretical general election.  

We also recognize that he already is a de facto top-tier candidate because of his fame and his fundraising.

If he were to be the nominee of the Republican Party we would heartily support him and endorse him.  We hope, however, that he is not, as he does not give the center-right coalition the best chance of winning.

Media Watch

Media Watch

County Government News

County Government News

Cities, Towns and Villages

Cities, Towns and Villages

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

Movies, Television, Pop Culture

  • Movies, Television, Pop Culture
    Selma   ????? We have now seen the Oscar-nominated movie Selma.   Our earlier allusion to criticism that sounded as though it was in an Oliver Stone category for historical fabrication is some...

Sports

Sports

The Major League Baseball Playoffs are not realistic, and destroy the actual meaning of the sport. 

Major League Baseball is unique in this respect—its postseason is markedly different from the way the game is played normally.  No other major league sport suffers from this flaw.

Not that much is wrong with baseball. In some respects it's the most well thought-out sport there is.  The "perfect game" many aficionados say.

But the Major League Baseball postseason experience is unique in the world of professional sports, and not in a good way. 

In fact the playoffs are flawed in such a way as to detract from the sport itself and diminish the game and what it means to be the world champion of the sport. 

Among the Big Four team sports of North America: football, hockey, basketball and baseball—and all the 122 professional major league teams competing in the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB respectively—it is in baseball alone that the postseason turns the sport itself on its head and makes it reflect something that it is not.  This article will explain why that happens and why it is wrong-headed.

 

Background on the The Frequency of Play

The 30 teams in both the National Hockey League and the National Basketball Association teams play a very similar schedule.  On average, each team has a day off between games, sometimes two days off.  Though there are back-to-back games, they are relatively infrequent.  NBA teams play between 14 and 22 back-to-back games a season, and for the NHL it usually ranges between 9 and 19. The NFL has a full week between games, the exception being the new Thursday games that each team plays once, leaving them only four days' rest once a year.

But baseball players play every single day.  Ten days straight, then a day off, then seven more games, then a day off, then ten more games.  Typically a baseball team plays 27 games every 30 days.  For the NHL and NBA it would be 14 per month, and for the NFL the number would be 4.

 

Getting to the Playoffs:  It's a grind

In all four sports, getting to the postseason requires a total team effort—in fact an all-out total organizational effort.  Teams must be deep, have bench strength and the capability of moving players in and out of the lineup, and on and off the roster, who can take the place of key players who go down for an injury, or who have to miss games for whatever reason.  While this is true of the other three major sports as well, it is most certainly even more of a concern for baseball teams because of the sheer volume of games in which a team must field a competitive lineup.

Each league's regular season* is a marathon, not a sprint.  NFL teams play for 17 weeks, 16 games.  The NHL has an 82-game season over six months, paralleled by an NBA season of 84 games over the same timeframe. Baseball is the biggest marathon of all—a true test of resilience and endurance—162 games usually starting around the beginning of April and finishing about the end of September.

NHL teams carry 23-man rosters, of which 20 can be active for any particular game.  The NBA is similar, with 15-man rosters of which 13 can be on the bench for a given game. In the NFL, the teams have 53 players on a roster, but only 46 can suit up on game day.  In Major League Baseball, teams have a 25-man active roster, and all 25 are at the park every day.

 

The Postseason Playoffs:  Sport by Sport

The National Football League:

Of the 32 teams, 12 qualify for the playoffs.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season.  Each team plays once a week, the exception being that the four top teams get the first week off.  For a typical qualifier to reach the Super Bowl, the team must play three consecutive weeks.  At that point both remaining teams have two weeks off before the Super Bowl.

In short, the playoffs, with a game each week, reflects the same means of advancement as is present in regular season grind.

The National Hockey League: 

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

 

The National Basketball Association

16 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  The playoffs are conducted in the exact same manner as the regular season: a game, a day off, a game, a day off, a game, a day off, and so on.  Just as in the regular season, there are occasionally two days off.  But the playoffs require the same stamina, the same approach as that required to make the playoffs.

Major League Baseball

10 of the 30 teams qualify for the postseason.  (Although four of those teams qualify only for a one-game do-or-die play-in game.)

Here is where all similarity to baseball ends. 

Unlike the other three sports whose playoffs mirror the test of the regular season, and whose conditions are the same as the regular season, Major League Baseball playoffs in no way resemble the sport itself.  In hockey, basketball and football, the teams win playoff games and reach the pinacle of the sport in exactly the same way that they qualify to try to do so. 

Not so in baseball.  They are two entirely different concepts.  Teams make the playoffs only because they have depth, five-man pitching rotations and can play day-in and day-out at a high level.  But the baseball playoffs suddenly become a kind of "all-star" game within each team's roster.  MLB playoffs are conducted in a way that more closely follows the NBA and the NHL.  Teams have enormous numbers of days off. 

Here's the key point:  No Major League Baseball team could even qualify for the postseason if they played the same way during the regular season that they do in the playoffs.  None.

In the regular season Major League Baseball teams have to use a 5-man starting rotation, with pitchers pitching every 5th day.  There are not enough days off to have even a four-man rotation, let alone a team with three pitchers.  Even the best team in baseball using only a 4-man rotation, would wear them out, and most likely end up with a record of something like 66-96, or 70-92—and that would be if they were otherwise teh best team in the sport.

 

The 2014 Baseball Postseason is Typical

As examples, last year's World Series teams the Kansas City Royals played only 15 games in 30 days, and the San Francisco Giants played only 17 games in 30 days.  The 12 to 15 days off in the non-baseball fantasy world of the MLB postseason, means that teams can turn to three pitchers and give all of them plenty of rest.  But it isn't the way baseball really works.

At one point, the Royals had 5 consecutive days off, and the Giants had 4.  This never happens in the regular season.  Even the All-Star break is only three days.  Very rarely is there anything beyond a one-day break, and even that happens only a couple of times a month. 

What this means is that neither team used the team that got them to the playoffs.  (The NFL, NBA and NHL teams ALL used the very same teams that got them to the playoffs.) 

Baseball teams use a three-man pitching rotation in the playoffs.  Sometimes, they essentially opt for two pitchers only—conceding the likelihood that some of their games are going to be lost—when their third-, or rarely fourth-best pitcher has to face one of their opponents' two-man or three-man rotation members. 

Imagine an NFL team using only one running back and three wide receivers, instead of rotating through their roster in the course of a playoff game—or using only 4 defensive backs and 4 linebackers, instead of rotating 8 or 9 DBs and 6 or 7 linebackers?  In hockey, would a team use only two or three of their forward lines?  Would an NBA team use only the starting five?  They would never make the post season if they tried to present that product to their fans during the regular season.

Those are the equivalents of what Major League Baseball sets up every fall.  No other sport drags its playoffs out in such a way as to completely change the playing field—completely change the dynamics of its game.

Why Does Baseball Do This?

MLB does this because the TV networks want to drag out the games so that they can try to have one game each day  This requires an unnecessary staggering of games, and creates the phenomenon of 15 off-days in a month.

What about travel days?

What about them?  Baseball has travel days constantly.  A team may play in Chicago one day and in Miami the next, or in New York one day and Phoenix the very next day.  Travel days as a routine part of the game are again, a phenomenon of television, and stretching out the playoffs.

In years past, travel days were employed only when necessary. The famous "subway series" games were played on seven consecutive days.  Why?  Because there was no "travel day" required to go from Brooklyn to the Bronx.  Today, they would put in artificial travel days.

Even fairly long train trips didn't necessarily matter.  The 1948 World Series between the Cleveland Indians and the Boston Braves was played in six consecutive days, October 6 & 7 in Boston, October 8, 9 & 10 in Cleveland, and October 11 back in Boston.

This reflects actual baseball, the way the teams play day-in and day-out, and the kind of unique test that baseball presents to its athletes, its managers and management, and to its fans.

In the modern world of charter planes, teams fly from coast to coast to play games on consecutive days.  The artificial "travel day" should be eliminated so that teams can play in the playoffs in the same way that got them there in the first place.


*All these leagues also have pre-seasons and training camps, which add an additional 6-8 weeks to each player's year.


Email us with your feedback, comments, questions and ideas. 

Religious Issues

Religious Issues

  • Religious Issues
    Coming Soon

Copyright New Mexico Political Journal 2015
EMAIL US WITH YOUR FEEDBACK, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS AND IDEAS

.

Loading...